Archive for February, 2010

Ludwig van Beethoven: The 9 Symphonies – Arturo Toscanini / NBC Symphony Orchestra

Ludwig van Beethoven: The 9 Symphonies – Arturo Toscanini / NBC Symphony Orchestra

Trascrizione per Pianoforte e Orchestra del Concerto per Violino e Orchestra, Op. 61/1: III. Rondo, Allegro

Trascrizione per Pianoforte e Orchestra del Concerto per Violino e Orchestra, Op. 61/1: III. Rondo, Allegro

4 Movements of a Symphony Exposed

It is divided into four ‘movements’ the orchestra stops between the parts. The first movement is fast, the second slow, the third medium, and the fourth fast. The feeling is like a novel an attention-attracting beginning, a slow, romantic section, a medium part that brings the story to its peak, and a fast ending where you can’t wait to find out what happens.

The first movement of a symphony shares the same form as the first movement of a sonata, a piece for a solo piano or a solo instrument accompanied by piano. Allegro means fast, so sonata-allegro means a certain form, played quickly.

The sonata-allegro form begins with a tune. In Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, it is the dah dah dah daaaaaaaah sequence. Then it goes to a contrasting tune that has a different sound because the home pitch is different from the first tune. Finally, there is a closing tune that brings the whole thing to an ending. It’s like the end of a sentence in the middle of a paragraph. The two tunes and the closing theme comprise the exposition, [...]

The Leningrad Symphony by Dmitri Shostakovich ? a Personal Interpretation

The Leningrad Symphony by Dmitri Shostakovich – a personal interpretation
Symphony No.7 Op.60 Dmitri Shostakovich

Like much music of quality, the Seventh Symphony of Dmitri Shostakovich, the Leningrad, is either loved or hated, rather than tolerated. It is famous, or infamous, depending on your point of view, for its first movement, a unique statement in the history of music, a movement lasting just under half of the symphony’s massive eighty minutes. It is also music, I believe, that is uniquely misunderstood, the popular interpretation being far too naïve an analysis of the motives of a composer as unpredictably and alternatively complex and trite as Shostakovich. So this is my personal version. First the description. I apologise if you already know the piece.

The piece opens with a confident, harmonically complex theme which seems to pass from one place to another, from one orchestral section to another like question, answer and analysis. It seems to portray life lived ordinarily, but tangibly celebrating the sophistication and tolerance of negotiated social contact. There is conflict here, but resolution is at hand through thought, interaction and experience. [...]